OXHN Partners — workflow comparison record guide
https://oxhn.com/ai-workflow-build-or-buy

HYPOTHETICAL INPUTS ARE INVENTED, NOT TESTED. No AI system was run. Not a quote, savings forecast, client result or vendor benchmark. Blank records contain no outcomes.

 Take the comparison to your team  These original, ungated CSVs open in a spreadsheet or text editor. The trial log and assumptions record contain headers only: no observations or outcomes are prefilled. Keep a separate assumptions row for each option and scenario; identify the measurement period, owner and evidence behind each input.    Download blank trial log (CSV)    Download blank assumptions record (CSV)    Download hypothetical inputs — not tested (CSV)    Download record definitions and formulas (text)    Use the records without losing the caveats  Use non-identifying case IDs, not client names. Source packs, drafts and corrected outputs stay in your team’s approved environment; this site accepts no uploads and does not store your records.  Record quality_gate as pass, fail, unresolved or not_assessed; a blank cell is not a pass. Use separate linked rows for raw and corrected outputs, mark the stage in exclusions_or_limitations, and count only the additional labor at each stage. Record missing observations as “not measured,” not zero. Zero critical errors in 20 cases does not guarantee a zero error rate.  Active person-minutes include prep_min + operate_min + verify_min + correction_min + exception_min + handoff_min, plus fallback_min_not_already_counted only when it is additional labor. Exception and fallback time must not overlap. Machine time and end-to-end elapsed time are separate; neither is automatically human labor. Sum concurrent staff person-minutes, not just elapsed minutes.  For assumptions, input_status is measured, estimate or hypothetical. Record mixed evidence or exclusions in evidence_reference; split scenarios when assumptions change. Direct cash uses a consistent currency (USD in the hypothetical inputs). Record existing subscription costs separately and count only incremental cash in the formulas. Every hypothetical row is invented, not client data, an OXHN quote, a forecast or tool-test evidence. No AI system was run.  The  workflow-fit worksheet  helps scope the decision; the  synthetic requirements-review example  shows a reviewable output and unresolved source dependencies.   Discuss a bounded workflow pilot: scope and evaluation . A non-sensitive description is enough. Do not upload client documents through this resource.  

Net monthly hours = assisted cases * (baseline minutes - active minutes) / 60 - maintenance hours.
Monthly capacity equivalent = net hours * hourly capacity value - monthly incremental cash.
First-year capacity equivalent = 12 * monthly equivalent - setup hours * hourly capacity value - additional setup cash.
This is capacity value, not cash profit or realized ROI. Use 12 full operating months only if appropriate; no ramp is assumed in the example. A failed or unresolved quality gate overrides economics.
Baseline 70 minutes, 40 eligible cases/month, 30 assisted and 10 unchanged; low-volume sensitivity uses 15 assisted and 25 unchanged. Hourly capacity value USD 60. All inputs hypothetical and quality not assessed.